POLICE PAY: CBAs’ longevity provisions improperly found unambiguous while excluding City’s extrinsic evidence but selectively relying on Officers’… $2,738,145.12 judgment reversed, remanded for retrial with extrinsic evidence… Swandal/Gilbert reversed. [Read more…]
Partnership dissolution, family ranch
PARTNERSHIP DISSOLUTION: Judicial dissolution of family ranch not necessary as partner’s interest was subject to Agreement’s buyout provisions… no jurisdiction to award fees following deemed-denied period… Huss reversed, affirmed as to dissolution; Hayworth reversed as to fees. [Read more…]
Sewage overflow, treatment “bypass,” CWA
SEWAGE OVERFLOW: City owed no legal duty to pump raw sewage into storm drains and river to prevent damage to residents’ property following massive rainstorm… “bypass” would have violated CWA, not justified by “unanticipated bypass” exception due to prior bypasses… Jones. [Read more…]
Quiet title, default, service by publication
QUIET TITLE properly granted via default judgment over claim of fraudulent service by publication… Moses affirmed (IOR I-3(c)). [Read more…]
Defense verdict, dog in road, stopped vehicle
VERDICT: Defense, vehicle drove off road to avoid vehicle stopped for dog… ear/neck/back/shoulder.
Matthew Daniels was traveling south on Hwy 206 east of Kalispell 6/30/15 to a work meeting near Lincoln in a Toyota Tundra truck. After rounding a blind curve he was confronted by a dog that had walked into and then stopped in his lane. According to Daniels, his options were to stop in his lane, drive into the oncoming lane and risk fatal injury to himself and others, drive off the right side of the road and into the ditch (because there was no shoulder), and risk serious injury to himself, or drive through the dog, likely killing it and potentially causing an MVA involving himself and others, and that the only reasonable option was to stop in the lane, which he did. Dalton Demars, whom Daniels had passed earlier, was behind Daniels in a Chevrolet Avalanche. According to Demars, Daniels had passed him exceeding the 60 mph speed limit, gone around a blind corner, and stopped in the southbound lane. When Demars came around the corner a few seconds later he could not stop so he took the ditch, rolled, and was injured. According to Demars, there was enough shoulder to pull off the highway and the ditch was not too steep to drive in. His Avalanche was totaled. He sued Daniels and Daniels’s employer River Design Group alleging negligence. Daniels and RDG asserted that they were not negligent and that Demars’s injuries were caused by his own negligence.
Judge Ortley directed verdict dismissing Daniels at the close of Plaintiff’s case based on the corporate shield doctrine. The jury was not informed of the dismissal of Daniels. He directed verdict at the close of Defendants’ case finding that Daniels had violated §61-8-355(1) (right wheels of vehicle stopped on 2-way road must be close as practicable to right edge of shoulder) and was negligent as a matter of law.
The Kalispell jury found 11-1 that Demars did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was damaged, and that Daniels’s negligence, caused by violation of §61-8-355(1), was a cause of those damages, and 12-0 that Demars did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Daniels was negligent in any other manner.
Demars, 29, suffered neck, back, and shoulder injuries and a torn ear.
Plaintiff’s experts: treating providers FNP Laura Hunter, Whitefish, and pain management specialist Camden Kneeland, Kalispell.
Defendants’ expert: forensic engineer Matthew Mecham, Salt Lake City.
Demand, $60,000; offer, $8,000; jury request, up to $300,000; jury suggestion, 0. Jock Schulte, mediator.
Jury deliberated 1½ hours 4th day.
Demars v. Daniels and River Design Group, Flathead DV 15-948, 10/6/16.
Evan Danno & Ashley Danno (Danno Law Firm), Kalispell, for Demars; Christopher Sweeney & Afton Ball (Moulton Bellingham), Billings, for Defendants.
$2,738,145 judgment, police wages/longevity
BENCH JUDGMENT: $2,738,145, failure to properly account for longevity in Billings police wages… Gilbert. [Read more…]
Insurance, home defects, $192,500 confession
INSURANCE: Insurer breached duty to defend contractor against home defect claims, liable for $192,500 settlement… Court declines to extend insurance exception or DJA to assignee of indemnity right under insurance contract for attorney fees… assignee has standing to bring coverage action, sue under UTPA, despite insurer not consenting to insured assigning rights… insurer’s coverage argument a non-issue following breach of duty to defend… risk retention group irrefutably subject to liability for any proven violations of UTPA, Court disheartened by representations otherwise… amendment by Plaintiff to fix typo granted over insurer’s request for summary judgment for citation to wrong statute… Christensen. [Read more…]
Farm partnership dissolution
FARM PARTNERSHIP DISSOLUTION: Arbitration, settlement… Cozzens/Todd. [Read more…]