SENTENCING: Improperly withheld information as to one informant unlikely to alter jury’s credibility evaluation, but failure to disclose other informant’s bias and exaggerated role possibly affected jury’s determination of amount of meth trafficked and resulting stiff sentence contrary to US’s niggling view of the undisclosed information… Defendant to be resentenced with lower maximums/minimums without informant’s testimony (too many reasons to disbelieve it) absent persuasive corroborating evidence… Molloy. [Read more…]