NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION/CPA: Chalet seller did not negligently misrepresent that ski-out access would be built by developer or violate CPA because representation was as to a future event, true at time it was made, prevented only by developer’s bankruptcy… argument about negligent misrepresentation elements not waived by raising in reply brief in support of in limine motion when opponent raised it in response brief… $2,232,386 bench judgment reversed… Tucker reversed. [Read more…]