EASEMENT: Rules 59-60 correctly found not to apply to 2018 motion for interpretation/clarification of 2014 judgment in ranches’ easement dispute… but 2014 judgment incorrectly found ambiguous on its face or effect… but judgment nonetheless imprecise/uncertain warranting interpretation/clarification… but judgment misinterpreted and thus erroneously altered/amended… remanded for amended judgment in accordance with Supreme Court’s interpretation/clarification… Wilson affirmed, reversed. [Read more…]
Real estate development, “muddled & chaotic case”
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT: Summary rulings in “muddled and chaotic case” in which no party substantially prevailed affirmed… no fees per prevailing party or derivative claim statute… Jones affirmed. [Read more…]
Defense verdict, pedestrian/auto, $52,000 settlement
VERDICT: Defense (95/5), pedestrian/auto, head/ neck/ribs/pelvis… $52,000 settlement from State and City. [Read more…]