INSURANCE: Reasonableness of $29 million stipulated judgment for breach of duty to defend improperly considered solely from perspective of uninsured Defendants, remanded for 2nd hearing and objective consideration of merits of underlying case and value to a prudent uninsured of confessing judgment… ESOP payouts not required to be deducted from $29 million but may be considered in reasonableness of settlement… Plaintiffs will be entitled to postjudgment interest if settlement approved following 2nd hearing, but not to prejudgment interest… Townsend reversed, affirmed. [Read more…]
$3,146,185 fees, $29M ESOP stipulated judgment
ATTORNEY FEES: $3,146,185 fees, $89,153 costs awarded in $29 million settlement/stipulated judgment and assignment of rights by grocery chain executives to 35 ESOP participants… $35,816,986 total judgment with $6,816,986 prejudgment interest… appeal bond waived for $26 billion insurer… Townsend. [Read more…]
Insurance, $29 million ESOP settlement, defend
INSURANCE: $29 million settlement by 35 ESOP participants and grocery chain executives found reasonable following reasonableness hearing on remand from Supreme Court holding that insurer breached duty to defend and was estopped from denying coverage and no evidence of collusion but reasonableness hearing required… $29 million judgment against insurer… Townsend. [Read more…]